What DO YOU THINK?!?! Help Others, Help Yourself!
Rules of the game: Provided your peers with feedback.
-You must review TWO websites in every Grade Level =SIX websites Per Person!
-You must answer the following questions FOR EVERY WEBSITE & STATE YOUR EVIDENCE!
-What does state your evidence mean?!?! State your evidence means you must give a detailed explanation for why you think what you think. You may NOT only say, “They did a good job!” or “It was horrible!” You must back up your thoughts with evidence about WHY they did a good job.
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
51 comments:
Alex M. & Hank W. had easy to understand, correct math. They had good colors and graphics that made the project look nice. It made me understand this subject and made me want to try it too. I would suggest that the authors try to have less lists and more pictures. The best part of this is the descriptions of how to do all of it and the vocabulary. The only improvement for it would be my suggestions to the authors. They followed the rubric well and did the best on the vocabulary. They need to improve the visionary part of their project. I would give this a low/medium A because of the improvements needed.
-E.W.
R.T. and E.B. did a good job with the website. I like the way that they teach you how to add integers. I like the animation with deerskin. It makes me want to try it.
J.M.
R.T. and E.B. did a good job with the website. I like the way that they teach you how to add integers. I like the animation with deerskin. It makes me want to try it. They followed the rubric perfectly and I give them and A. I do not have any suggestions.
J.M.
6th Grade: WO
MF and ER:
The quality of the math at our level and most words were easy to read.
The graphics popped out and made the math more interesting and fun.
One suggestion for the website is to make the letters more readable.
They followed the rubric and they did the best on the questions.
I would give them an A.
The math equations were all properly answered and progressively got more challenging; whish helped the ideas of the math flourish in your head. Proper spelling and grammar allowed the point to easily glide across; however at some points I felt more detail would be sufficient. While the background seemed flamboyant and interesting at first, repeated use left it a droll. However, I felt a want to implement the math into my everyday life. The most intriguing part of the website was the assessment, for it was divided into two parts, which gave it a better impression on me. However the rubric was not followed to the greatest possible extent for some of the requirements were no where to be found. I believe that the practice questions were missing, thus obviously need work. All in all, I would give the report a B, since although it was great, many flaws were to be found
Emily W. and Macayla B. This website was very easy to understand because the makers of the website had proper grammar so you didn't need to struggle to understand what they were explaining. The math in their presentation was correct math. The graphics were very fun, especially how the page designs were set up. They had bright colors that really grab the reader’s attention. The only suggestion I have for the authors is that they should mkae the background a little less exciting so the reader doesn't get distracted by the pretty background. Though, this does also work as a compliment, for the graphics and presentation are very good. The best part of the website
WO
7th Grade:
AB and LR:
The quality of the math was a bit un-organized, but easy to read.
All of the graphics caught your eye by moving and making the math
One suggestion for the website is to make separate pages for separate mini subjects.
They followed the rubric for everything except for making a bibliography.
I would give them an A.
SK
BV and TD in 6th grade
The math equations were all properly answered and progressively got more challenging; whish helped the ideas of the math flourish in your head. Proper spelling and grammar allowed the point to easily glide across; however at some points I felt more detail would be sufficient. While the background seemed flamboyant and interesting at first, repeated use left it a droll. However, I felt a want to implement the math into my everyday life. The most intriguing part of the website was the assessment, for it was divided into two parts, which gave it a better impression on me. However the rubric was not followed to the greatest possible extent for some of the requirements were no where to be found. I believe that the practice questions were missing, thus obviously need work. All in all, I would give the report a B, since although it was great, many flaws were to be found
CB
TD and BV 6th grade:
1.) I believe that the math was okay. The basic math was good, but it seemed as though that I learned more from what I was taught by the teacher. The lesson seemed to be repeating over and over, just teaching us the same thing. However, I did find the math explained simply and it was easy to understand.
2.) Actually, the graphics within this presentation were nice, and it did make me want to try the math. The good use of coordinate grids and word art made a nice and fun looking presentation.
3.) The suggestions that I would give the authors would be this: Having less information is worse than having more. I would recommend that they put more information onto their presentation.
4.) The only parts of the rubric that I found fault in was the ten clear assessment questions. The authors tried to pass of five more questions at the end of their PowerPoint in addition to the five that they had at the beginning as a final exam. The two did best on giving other resources so that students could look for more information on the topic. (Trust me they would need to.) The authors do need to improve on creating final, and pre-quizzes.
Final over-all grade = B
6th Grade EBC
WO and JD
The quality of the math was at our level and it would be easy to learn if I didn’t know about coordinate grids. The graphics on this project were outstanding. If I were someone who wanted to learn about coordinate grids, this would be a place that I would want to look at. I actually wanted to try out the problems. The site was almost perfect. The only thing that I would suggest is to add interactive test. The beat part of the site is probably the whole site. The only part of the site that needed improvement was the next page buttons. They were only one off. They followed the rubric to every last point. Like I said, everything was good. I would give this site an A because everything was well put.
WO
8th Grade:
AW and BKB:
The quality of the math is big and easy to read.
The graphics are very colorful and catch your eye easily.
One suggestion for the website is to make sure that the pictures are not covering the words.
They followed the entire rubric completely.
I would give them an A.
AM
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• WO and JD
what do you think of the content?
• Poor
• not really
Did it grab your attention?
• poor
• no
What suggestions do you have?
• make it more mathematically based
• illustrations
• the math
What about the rubric?
• Not really
• spelling
• the test and practice problems
What grade would you give you site?
• C because they didn’t follow the rubric that much
C.S.p6
Who are you talking about?
A.M. and H.W. Period 6
What do you think of the content?
The lesson that they were teaching was very comprehensive and easy to understand. The quality of the math was suitable for six graders; it was not too hard and not too simple for future six graders to learn.
Did it grab your attention?
There weren’t much graphics, but there was an okay media. The PowerPoint wouldn’t really interest me to try math that much, however I thought that it had a great way of providing practice problems.
What suggestions do you have?
I would suggest that the authors should add something more exciting for the student watching the slide show. I believe that the best part of the presentation was giving the student the availability to see whether they got the correct answer, or an incorrect answer. I think that the media may need a little bit of improvement because it would make it more fun for the viewer.
What about the rubric?
They followed the rubric pretty accurately in the sense of teaching the actual lesson, which they did best at. Again I feel that an improvement should be catching the onlooker’s attention.
What grade would you give you site?
I would give this presentation an A as a letter grade because of a great lesson teaching and overall substantial production. I don’t think that a 100% would be necessary, because it was not too interesting to me.
ZB
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• WO and JD, 6th grade
What do you think of the content?
• The quality wasn’t at its best because the math felt rushed even though it was explained on about 5 pages. The website made me want to learn what was on it, but the math wasn’t explained in as much detail as it could’ve been.
• The material could be understood but not as well as it could’ve been because of the little details on how to solve the problems.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics and drawing were cute and added humor to the website and the project.
• The way the website was set up, I was more focused on the pictures than the actual work.
What suggestions do you have?
• I would suggest keeping the pictures to a smaller amount.
• I think the test questions were very well planned out because they were both challenging and they targeted key areas needed to be known about the concept.
• I think the diagrams could be explained in more detail.
What about the rubric?
• They included everything needed on the rubric.
• The additional requirements part of the rubric was the part demonstrated in the project.
• The assessment part of the rubric could be better demonstrated in the project.
What grade would you give you site?
• B because of the minimum of how to work out the problems and the small amount of teachings of the concept.
WO
8th Grade Honors:
AM and CC:
The quality of the math was the right size and easy to read.
The graphics include animations that are fun and catch your eye.
One suggestion is to make it easier to get from page to page.
They followed the rubric entirely all accept the number of sources they needed.
I would give them an A.
7th Grade
AB and LR EBC
The quality if the site was awesome. The site was easy to understand. The graphics were alright. It made me want to do the math. Suggestions are to make the site eye popping. The best part was how they put together the site. The graphics needed improvement. They followed the rubric well. I think that they did best on was the practice problems. They needed to add a bibliography. I would give them a B because on the bibliography.
E.E.W.
1. 6th Grade; S.K. and M.M.
2. I think that the content was great! It was very educational, yet entertaining. The info was easy to understand, but could have been simpler.
3. The graphics were good, and made it much more interesting to watch. I think it did make you want to try it out it kept you very interested.
4. My suggestions would be to have less vibrant backgrounds. Although it kept you interested, it was a little bit distracting. I liked that you had a lot of examples.
5. They followed the rubric pretty well. They did the best on presentation. I don’t think they needed to work on anything.
6. A. They covered everything they needed to, but kept it interesting.
1. 6th grade honors WO and JD
It was a very enjoyable site packed with information yet with a lot of ideas and creepy animation. I would totally recommend this for the puny 6th grade honors! It was brilliant! They had a good choice to pick wix as their website creator. The graphics were hilarious and for some reason motivated me to do their math problems! I don’t have any necessarily bad comments; I would just say “keep making websites!” I would give them an A+, because they did a beautiful website and did great in everything.
SK
HW and AM, 6th grade
There were no clashing hues between font and background causing no strain on the eyes to read. The math was correctly solved and displayed in a neat, readable format. However, the graphics were dull and lifeless, and with the repeating statements you couldn’t help but be bored. I would suggest to the authors of this PowerPoint to simply revise for content. The most interesting part of the website was the vocabulary page, for it was by far the most informative. And the worst portion of the power point would be the bibliography, for it was separated in two. I could no help but be confused at an inconceivable extent. No matter what, they followed the rubric step by step and evenly covered all of the data.
HW
Who are you talking about?
WO and JD
What do you think of the content?
Pretty Good
Very easy to understand
Did it grab your attention?
Great Graphics
Yes
What suggestions do you have?
When you get the answer correct, don’t have too many things going on at once
The graphics
The test
What about the rubric?
Yes
Showing how it works
The Test
What grade would you give you site?
A, because they did great at most parts, and good at some.
1. 7th grade honors
HH and SA
First of all, it looks very much bland but exceeds in necessary information. They need way more graphics. The subject is hard to understand but really can understand since they have plenty support. It defiantly did not make me want to do the math. I would put way more graphics and make it on a wix. I would give them a B+ for they defiantly gave support, but was completely dead in spirit.
HW
Who are you talking about?
HH and SA 7th grade
What do you think of the content?
It was alright, but confusing
I could understand it, but I had to think
Did it grab your attention?
Very dull
No
What suggestions do you have?
Try adding better backgrounds
The best part of the site was the jobs that may use it
Most of it could have been better
What about the rubric?
Most parts yes, some parts no.
Why do you need to learn this
Spelling and graphics
What grade would you give you site?
B because it was alright and it covered material, but it was confusing, boring, and dull
HW
Who are you talking about?
AM and CC 8th grade honors
What do you think of the content?
on a scale of 1 – 10, 9
yes
Did it grab your attention?
very good graphics
yes
What suggestions do you have?
try not to make the backgrounds moving, it distracts people (or at least me)
The practice problems
The test, it only had 5 problems
What about the rubric?
Yes
Explaining it
The test
What grade would you give you site?
A, because it had great aspects, but the test had only half of the problems
3. 8TH grade honors
They did awesome! It totally excelled in the graphics and the lesson. They weren’t that kooky as WO and JD, but they did well! It motivated me to do the math and I did the quiz! The quality was great and was simple to understand. I would tell the authors to continue making a website. Improvement isn’t necessary. I would give them an A+
2. 8th grade
KW and JM
The quality of the math was fine and was easy to understand. There wasn’t any graphics but had a lot of color and had supportive images. It did motivate me a little. I would say that it was a good presentation and that it had what it needed. The best part was the quiz. The entire site needed some more graphics. I would give them an A-.
HW
Who are you talking about?
DN and AH 8th grade
What do you think of the content?
On a scale of 1 to 10, 8
yes
Did it grab your attention?
Bad graphic, same thing every time
A little
What suggestions do you have?
Use backgrounds
The best part was the explaining
It doesn’t finish sentences at one part at the beginning
What about the rubric?
most of the time
explaining the process
graphics
What grade would you give you site?
A, because they aren’t honors, and they did okay
M.V
EVEDINCE: this web site is great and they displayed all the information correctly and over all it was wonderful. it was not boring and there was color everywhere and it didn’t leave a single piece of information out.
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• 6th grade: W.O and J.D
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math was good but there were some things that were unneeded and off topic.
• It was easy to understand but I feel they could have done a better job of explaining what to do.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were great and they added to the web site
• it did want to make me do math.
What suggestions do you have?
• I would tell the authors to try to stay on topic but still keep things fun.
• I think the best part of the site was the fact that they made learning about coordinate graphs fun and easy.
• I don’t think anything in this site should be improved.
What about the rubric?
• Yes they did follow the rubric and they had everything that was needed and more
• I think they did the review questions the best because I tied math and fun together.
• the 5th section could use improvement because the directions were to small.
What grade would you give you site?
• I would give this project an A because they over all did a great job. they displayed the information correctly and everything needed was there.despite the fact that they had one unneeded detail it was wonderful
8th Grade EBC
AW and BKB
The quality of the power point was okay. It seemed boring to me. It was easy to understand. There was no graphics at all. It didn’t even make me want to do the math. I think that they need to make the power point exciting. To me, there wasn’t a best part. They needed to make it eye popping. They followed the rubric. They did the best on explaining. The graphics need improvement. I would give them an A because they explained it really well.
C.D.
What Do You Think?
-What does state your evidence mean?!?! State your evidence means you must give a detailed explanation for why you think what you think. You may NOT only say, “They did a good job!” or “It was horrible!” You must back up your thoughts with evidence about WHY they did a good job.
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• 7th grade: N.H. and P.M.
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math was good but there was only two Q’s and A’s for the quiz and same for the practice.
• No it was not easy to understand at all because they were jumping around from place to place and it just made it really confusing. And they did not state the vocabulary needed with definitions until the end of the power point.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were ok but they could have done better it was very dull backgrounds and they were the same throughout the whole thing.
• It dint make me want to do the math or try it out because they didn’t make it seem very exciting and the backgrounds were so dull it made me tired.
What suggestions do you have?
• I would suggest to the authors to change up the backgrounds. I say to do this because it changes the mood of the audience and right now your backgrounds are to dull and tiring.
• The best part of this was the math and info on the subject.
• The how to needed some improvement because it was to confusing and needed more info.
What about the rubric?
• Yes they followed the rubric
• They did best on the bibliography.
• They need to improve on the how to and the test.
What grade would you give you site?
A low b or a high c because they really needed improvement on the how to the backgrounds and the test.
MC
Who are you talking about?
• AW HW
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
The quality of the math was really good and it made snese.
• Was it easy to understand?
Yes
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
I think the graphics were good.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Yes, because they explained their topic really well.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
I think they did great and they followed the rubric well.
• What was the best part of the site?
The best part was the Examples Slide because it really summed up their topic and it laid out their topic well.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
I think maybe just putting a little bit more of an explanation to why they chose their websites.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes.
• What section did they do the best on?
The How To Find A Circumference section
• What section did they need to improve on?
I don’t think they really needed improving
What grade would you give you site?
• A because they followed the rubric and their information on their topic was clear and understandable.
MC
Who are you talking about?
• CB CS
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
The quality of math equations is minimal but its okay
• Was it easy to understand?
It was easy to understand
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
The graphics didn’t really help me that much except for the Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally picture which helped me remember PEMDAS
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
It made me want to do math especially the topic of PEMDAS because they explained it well
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
I think they should have put more helpful graphics and a little but more example problems.
• What was the best part of the site?
The best part was when they put each letter from PEMDAS and explained what each one meant in different slides so it made more sense to me.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
Explaining why each of the sites they chose to help them was useful.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
I think they followed the rubric.
• What section did they do the best on?
Vocabulary was the best section
• What section did they need to improve on?
What grade would you give you site?
• B because it didn’t really catch my attention that much.
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
TD and BV 6th grade
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
It was so-so, they could be better
• Was it easy to understand?
Yes! I understood.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
Could be more…
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Hmm… I guess, (but it takes a lot to make me do math :D)
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
More graphics
• What was the best part of the site?
The beginning, because it’s pretty epic.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
The mini quiz could be better
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
B, they did moderately good.
WO and JD The math quality is good, I mean there are no mistakes that I found when checking their math. It is easy to understand, and not too hard for a grade lowers then ourselves to understand it. The graphics really grab the reader’s attention. For the background is colorful, and there are movement in the graphics that would want the reader to read more about the math. I would suggest to the authors to not make the presentation too distracting and get the reader off topic. The best part of the site was when they explained the grids on double grids because they had an excellent explanation for explaining the double grids. The part of the site that needs improvement is the fact that they have very funny, but distracting backgrounds. They did not fully follow the rubric because they do not have a vocabulary page. I give this site a B because some things they did not do.
8th Grade Honors EBC
AC
The quality of the power point was boring. It wasn’t easy to understand. There were no graphics at all. I didn’t want to do the math. The power point needed more excitement. There was no best part. They need something other than words and two color backgrounds. They didn’t follow the rubric that well. Not a best part. They need graphics. I would give him a C only because there was some things, but very little.
SK
SR in seventh Grade
The math was of poor quality and the equations given were impossible to understand.
The background was bland, although it allowed the test to be extremely east to read. I felt no incline to try the math.
I strongly advise the author of this power point to check the rubric, for many of it’s requirements are missing. The best part of the site was the test, which was much better than the instructions on how to solve the problems.
The portion of the rubric that needs the most work would be the instructions, however the assessment was great.
All in all, I would give a C
HH. SA.
It was very easy to understand, simple and has pictures to demonstrate the subject. I have to admit, they could’ve done a little better in the graphics, it was a little boring. I think they could’ve done better on grabbing the readers attention, it did not make me want to try the math. My suggestions are to have listed what a Pythagorean Theorem is, and to have made the graphics more exciting. The best part of their PowerPoint was the examples because they were easy to follow and very detailed. They did follow the rubric. I would give them an A.
C.S.
Who are you talking about?
A.B. and L.R.
What do you think of the content?
The quality of the math definitely seems advanced enough for me to learn. I just can’t wait to learn all of those things. If you go over the site slowly you can comprehend it easily. It was very self-explanatory and easy to catch onto.
Did it grab your attention?
The media grabbed my attention without a doubt! It was unique, and the graphics were very fun noticeable. I totally want to try math now! It seems fun, interesting, and motivating.
What suggestions do you have?
I suggest that the authors should just take one more look at the spelling to overview their presentation; otherwise I thought it was fantastic. The best part of the site was the lesson and media. They incorporated many fun qualities in the site and included a variety of different features about the topic. I believe that only reviewing to make sure that there were no spelling errors or misplacement's needed some improvement, and that’s all.
What about the rubric?
They followed the rubric almost perfect, except for one tiny spelling error that just needed that of improvement. They did best on explaining the lesson in a very fun way for students to learn how to about rational and irrational numbers.
What grade would you give you site?
I would give this sit an A+ because I honestly believed it was the absolute perfect site, all except for a misspelled word. This site was awesome!!
E.A.W. 6th
Evaluations
6th:
R. T. and E. B. had good math quality that was easy to understand. They had great graphics and made math seem fun. I would suggest to the authors a little more spell check and some more interesting things. The best part of this website was the way they taught the subject through an animation named deerskin. They need to improve on spelling and following the rubric. They missed things like vocabulary, why should they learn this and spelling. They did very well on the how to and the practice. They need to improve on the missing things as I said in the suggestions and for the rubric. I would give this project a B for all the above reasons.
7th:
H. H. and S. A. had great quality math that was easy to understand. This project didn’t have very many graphics but nicely colored writing and interesting pictures. It made me want to learn how to do the material and it even taught me how. I would suggest that the authors have possibly more pictures and or backgrounds. I really liked how they made their descriptions and explanations make sense. The only things I think needed improvement were what my suggestions were and possibly a nicer font that did not make the colored font look like too much. They followed the rubric well and did a great job on their explanations. I would give this project an A for all these reasons.
8th
A. L. and S. R. had good math quality that was pretty easy to understand. This project had no graphics and few pictures. It made it simple to learn the subject but it didn’t exactly catch my eye. I would suggest that the authors include more visuals and possibly more interesting text. More color and or backgrounds would be nice, too. I liked how they used word art and how some things were almost so obvious it was funny. They had good descriptions and explanations. They needed to improve the things I wrote of in my suggestions. These reasons are why I would give this project a B.
8th Honors
A. M. and C. C. had good quality math that was well explained so understanding it was semi-simple. This project had good graphics and models, but the side graphics were slightly distracting. They made it easy to learn. I would suggest to the authors to make their website a little easier to make their way through with less back buttons and more menus that stay on every page. They had good descriptions and explanations though. I liked how they made the learning fun, easy, slow, and smooth. I think they need to improve on the things I suggested. For these reasons, I would give this project an A.
AC NJ grade 8
It was very easy to understand, you know what they’re talking about. I have no comment about the math quality. The graphics were boring, it did not make me want to try the math. I would say to the authors, explain more about the topic, get better graphics, check your math, and follow the rubric better. The best part of the site was the bibliography, at least they did that right. They needed to improve on almost everything, they need how-tos they need to explain how to do the problem! They need to take a second look at the rubric and totally re-do everything. I would give them a d because of their lack of following the directions.
C.S.6th
Who are you talking about?
A.W. & B.K.B. (period NOT stated)8th grade
What do you think of the content?
The quality of the math was fairly understandable and advanced enough for students entering the 8th
grade.
Did it grab your attention?
The graphics didn’t really stand out a lot. It wouldn’t really make me want to try what they are trying to teach that much, because it doesn’t really seem that interesting.
What suggestions do you have?
I suggest that the authors needed some improvement to make it more noticeable. The graphics weren’t really that enjoyable. The best part of the site would be the way they taught the lesson.
What about the rubric?
They followed the rubric appropriately enough. They did best on the “how to’s” and explaining. They may have needed some improvement on the practice problems.
What grade would you give you site?
I would give them an A because they followed your given instructions on the rubric.
AJ and CD 8 grade honors
The math quality was great, and it was very easy to understand, and detailed too!
It did grab my attention, and I wanted to try to math from it. I have no suggestions for the authors. The best part of the site was explanations, it was very detailed. They needed to add a answer document, I didn’t see one. They did follow the rubric, and I would give an A because they were organized, detailed, and their math quality was great. MM
M.F.
•MB and EW 6th grade
•I thought that the content was very nice and creative. The quality of this math is awesome. I thought it was very easy to understand.
•This did grab my attention. I thought the graphics jumped out. It did want me to at least try the math.
•The suggestions that I have are to use bigger fonts, but over all I thought it was awesome!! The best part of the site is Ms. Subtraction. The part of the site that needed improvement was the font size because it was sort of hard to read some things.
•Yes, they did follow the rubric. They did best on spelling. They need to improve on how they ordered things.
•I would give them an A because I think that they did an outstanding job. I fell that they really did a great job explaining and adding detail to their project.
M.F.
• MB and EW 6th grade
• I thought that the content was very nice and creative. The quality of this math is awesome. I thought it was very easy to understand.
• This did grab my attention. I thought the graphics jumped out. It did want me to at least try the math.
• The suggestions that I have are to use bigger fonts, but over all I thought it was awesome!! The best part of the site is Ms. Subtraction. The part of the site that needed improvement was the font size because it was sort of hard to read some things.
• Yes, they did follow the rubric. They did best on spelling. They need to improve on how they ordered things.
• I would give them an A because I think that they did an outstanding job. I fell that they really did a great job explaining and adding detail to their project.
MF
1.) LR and AB 7th grade
2.) I thought that this content was very appealing. It was an amazing site. The quality was awesome. It was very easy to understand.
3.) This site did grab my attention. I thought the graphics were really cool and creative. I did want to try out the math.
4.) The suggestions I have are to use bigger font because it was sort of hard to read. The best part of the site as the backgrounds. I think that they needed to add more pictures.
5.) Yes they did follow the rubric. The best part was the using the six traits. They needed to fix just a few spelling errors.
6.) I would give them a B+ because they showed great detail and made it look like they spent a lot of time on their site.
MF and CD
1.) RW JH 8th grade honors
2.) Content was very good. Quality was awesome. Very easy to understand.
3.) This did grab my attention. The graphics were nice. It did make me want to do the math.
4.) The suggestions I have are to add more info to fill up the gaps. The best part was the little owls on every page. Needed to improve on using better fonts because it was hard to read some of them.
5.) Yes they did follow the rubric.
6.) I would give them a high B because they didn’t fill all their space up and there was a lot of blank spots on their site.
C.S.
Who are you talking about?
E.G. & C.L. p.3 or 4 (8th grade honors)
What do you think of the content?
The quality of the math taught in this lesson was great for an advanced 7th grade class. It was easy to understand because it was taught be steps.
Did it grab your attention?
There weren’t many graphics included in the PowerPoint, but it was not too plain and boring. It did make me want to keep reading and learn about math.
What suggestions do you have?
I suggest that the authors explain the lesson a little bit more, by expanding the presentation which needed some more improvement. The best part of the site was the organization.
What about the rubric?
The authors of the presentation about radicals followed the rubric very well. It doesn’t seem like they missed any things that were supposed to be done. They did best at explaining each and every process about radicals. They needed to do better at giving more information about radicals.
What grade would you give you site?
I would give this site an A because they appeared to follow the directions to create a lesson.
JS
6th grade
1. Bailey T. and Emma W.
2. The content was very well written and it was very easy to understand.
3.the graphics were ok but could be a little more exciting, but it was kind of made me want to do math.
4. I would add more graphics but it wasn’t really good all ready. My favorite slide was all of it. Nothing really needed to be improved.
5. I would give this an “A” because it had all the requirements and it was pretty good.
A.A.M.
6th grade honors
Who are you talking about?
• J.M. J.S.
What do you think of the content?
• The math was clear, understandable and easy.
• The math was easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were awesome! They moved and they were really cute!
• It made me want to go out and skip in the meadows! But it made math look fun
what suggestions do you have?
• I would tell the authors to explain the math a little more and walk them step by step through the practice problems. Also, make sure all of the words are able to read easily.
• The best part of the site was the practice problems because they were awesome and the practice problems appeared very easy!
• The part of the site that needed improvement was all of the parts that were not explained very well.
What about the rubric?
• They did follow the rubric.
• They did the best on the practice problems.
• They need to improve on explaining and teaching step by step.
What grade would you give you site?
• I would give the site a B because it grabbed attention but it was not done to the best of the student’s ability because it looked like they put more effort into pictures than the math itself.
S.S
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
M.F. & E.R. 6th grade
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
It seemed pretty easy.
• Was it easy to understand?
It was some what easy to understand. The information was a little scattered. Not exactly in chronological order :/ But I really liked it :D
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
The graphics defiantly grabbed my attention. Good creativity.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
It made me want to sit down and look into the website ever more so that the concept was easy and clear to me.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
Make sure that all information is clear and easy to read. Don’t add to much information onto one page. Make sure everything is in chronological order. Be organized
• What was the best part of the site?
The best part was all of the backgrounds and creativity that was put into the website. The best slide/page was the “What Is It”.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
The slide that may of needed improvement would be the assessment page.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
They mostly followed the rubric, missing few things.
• What section did they do the best on?
Did the best in either the explaining portion, or the test/quizzes.
• What section did they need to improve on?
May improve in everything, but well done on the project.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give them a B, because you can see where they used their effort. The concept was easily known and understandable. Their citing wasn’t fully developed though. They did not have the state standard. More vocabulary would help. All the quizzes and tests were well done. Wonderful Project but of used improvement.
B.H,
The authors of the power point is B.T. and E.W. They are in grade 6, period 6. The quality of the work in this power point was high. It grabbed my attention and held it through out the presentation. The math work was easily understood. It wasn’t that creative or original but it was well decorated and displayed. It didn’t make me want to do the math, but it made me think about the math. I thought that the best part of the site was the practice problems. You may have needed improvements on the credits and/or the wording you used to explain the concepts. I suggest that you put more credits like websites or books you may have used. Maybe you could have worded the explanations a little different also. Otherwise, you did a wonderful job on the project. You followed the rubric very well.
6th Grade Honors
Who are you talking about?
MW. & ZB. Period 6
What do you think of the content?
How was the quality of the math?
Very good, they gave many ways to show how to divide fractions.
Was it easy to understand?
It was sort of easy to understand. The only bad thing is you had to open many different things just to understand one topic.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
The graphics fit very well on the power-point. You can tell they spent a lot of time trying to make this project unique and special.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Well, I already know how to do this, but yes it does.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
Next time, make the backgrounds a little more related to math, not just anything.
• What was the best part of the site?
The effort you could tell they put into it & the way they directed the site.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
The sketchfu. The words went a little fast and they didn’t break down the problem that much.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes.
• What section did they do the best on?
There resources page, it has many useful websites and books.
• What section did they need to improve on?
Vocabulary, they could of added mored=.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
A, they spent a lot of time on this. You can tell they put effort into it and it wasn’t a last minute project. They instructed their topic well.
Post a Comment